Orlando de Lassus (ca. 1532–1594)

Orlando de Lassus, with Palestrina and Victoria, irepresents the maturation of Renaissance sacred music.  He was Catholic and wrote during the Catholic counterreformation, which had a significant impact on his work.  He was a prolific composer of both sacred and secular works.  Although conservative in style, he wrote approximately 50 parody masses based not only upon secular melodies, but even some that bordered on the risqué, such as Clemens non Papa’s chanson, “Entre vous filles.”  As one could expect, his motets are more adventuresome than are his masses.

See the following for some examples of his works: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIXJMKF8gYY and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9ISZFBjpRw&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDghDwMhOP8&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQV9E4e5dWo&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89gNkOjZ8Dg&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pr3zpCF56x8&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoGpYbqvpJk&feature=related; and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w743skBk09g&feature=related.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina (1526 – 1594)

Palestrina is the best-known of Renaissance a cappella choral music composers. He was a prolific composer of more than 100 masses, 300 motets (which were on sacred texts but are not formalized as liturgy), many hymns, Magnificats, lamentations,  and a large number of madrigals, i.e., secular music.

His popular name is derived from the name of his birthplace, Palestrina. His best known mass was the Pope Marcellus Mass. There is an apocryphal story that he wrote to the mass as the Council in Trent considered whether polyphonic music, with its secular connections and polyphonic complexity distracted its congregations and should be prohibited from the churches.

You will recall that organum often had a vigorous, throaty sound. With Palestrina, polyphony became almost suave. Whereas Palestrina was using was expressive, it was not ostentatious; to the contrary, it was sublime. While abuse of polyphony and its inclusion of secular elements were considerations of the counsel in Trent, it is doubtful that it was written for that purpose. While expressive, his sacred works are not ostentatious, but rather, sublime. Whereas dissonances were almost jarring at times in its use in organum, Palestrina used it on a weak beats or passing tones which did not jar, but rather created a bit of tension which then resolved to consonance. His style is generally considered to be the culmination of Renaissance polyphonic sacred music.
He had three distinct styles of polyphony but each shares a quality of refinement.

See http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/439795/Giovanni-Pierluigi-da-Palestrina/5470/Music for an excellent Britannica Encyclopedia article concerning Palestrina.

For examples of his early Flemish style, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMRAsAkPH9g, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qTICFxan04,

For examples of his middle style, and discography of its representative work, the Missa Papae Marcelli, see http://www.answers.com/topic/palestrina-missa-papae-marcelli.
For performances of the Kyrie of that work, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIcrgNtyX0U which is performed by the Tallis Singers with views of various architectural and decorative views representative of the cathedrals of that time; and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16cH1RZcPKs with images of the score.
For the credo of that work, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A02VoJFv-jk; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1M8_daKHASc.

For examples of his later style, see these performances of Stabat Mater at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoSQ4bYjRVs
and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoMs9Uyqego&feature=related

For his lamentations, see https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=Lamentations+palestrina+youtube&oq=Lamentations+palestrina+youtube&gs_l=serp.12..0i8i30.37181.37181.0.41202.1.1.0.0.0.0.376.376.3-1.1.0.les%3B..0.0…1c.1.MTFo6Tl_XT8&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=2ae57bceec566c09&biw=1017&bih=444.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcWdh6ro5Ps&feature=related for Madrigali a quattro voci.

For a performance of his Vergine bella by the Vocalia Consort see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy9d5Zp3i7U

The Musical Aftermath of Henry VIII’s Divorce: Thomas Tallis (c. 1505 –1585) and William Byrd (1540–1623)

Henry VIII’s Divorce

In 1509, Henry VIII, age 18, ascended the throne of England. His interests were then, as now, the common interests of a youth: of sport, of intellectual prowess and as monarch, political clout, with soldiers and a Navy at his command.
The priest – become – Chancellor, Wolsey, had served Henry VII and likewise served Henry VIII. He recognized the moral profligacy of the English clergy, but was not above it, himself. The public, also recognized its base condition. Heresy increased. In 1506, 45 men were charged and tried for heresy; most recanted, but two were burned to death. There were many such inquisitional trials throughout England for the next 15 years. The heresies giving rise to such barbarity included the rejection of transubstantiation for consubstantiation; rejection of the intermediary role of priests to consecrate or absolve; rejection of the salvific necessity for sacraments; rejection of pilgrimages and prayers for the dead; the notion that celibacy was contrary to human nature and that priests should marry (probably as a reaction to widespread concubinage of English clergy); and even, with Luther, the notion that the Christian is saved by faith, and not by works.
In 1521 Henry VIII issued his vituperous Assertion of the Seven Sacraments against Martin Luther, which many believed was authored by Wolsey. Luther took his time to reply, but then in kind, to the “King of the Lies, King Heinz, by God’s disgrace King of England.”
We have often heard of Henry VIII’s request for an annulment of his marriage to Catherine, of denial by the Church, and of his decision to part ways with the Catholic Church because of that denial.

Somewhat foreshadowing Princess Di, the English public remained sympathetic and devoted to Catherine. Among the lower classes, the divorce was an anathema; many clergy had difficulty accepting the replacement of the Pope with Henry VIII; the demise of Wolsey left the clergy without support or defense; and the northern provinces remained strongly Catholic and loyal to the pope. In England, proper, nationalism prevailed over ecclesiastical demands. There appeared a written demand that the King confiscate property of the hurch in England: “The Supplication of the Beggars.” There was further intrigue; Thomas Cromwell, who grew up in poverty but came to serve Wolsey, came to valiantly support King Henry. Henry was able to obtain from the parliament a declaration annulling the marriage of him with Catherine, thereby bastardizing their child, Mary.  Ultimately, Patliament declared the King to be sovereign over the Church in England (Anglican church). Chaotic! This was the political and cultural environment in which Thomas Thales and Robert Byrd lived and composed.

Thomas Tallis

Thomas Tallis is one of England’s great composers. He was a Roman Catholic in a time of religious turmoil in England precipitated by Henry VIII when he established the Anglican church. Queen Mary granted him and the younger William Byrd exclusive rights to publish monophonic and polyphonic music in England, the use of a manor and an annual income.

His style of writing moved from melismatic treatment of the texts to syllabic and chordal treatments, wedding music to text.  He wrote a number of anthems in the English vernacular.  In a time when musical composition was becoming more complex, he maintained a more simple style with the possible exception of his Spem In Alium , written for eight choirs and forty parts or voices.  Even then, despite the many voices, it remains thematically, rhythmically and harmonically simple.

God Grant with Grace (Psalm 67:1-2: http://bibleasmusic.com/god-grant-with-grace-psalm-67-1-2-thomas-tallis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBibleAsMusic+%28The+Bible+as+Music%29

See http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/composers/tallis.htm for a brief biography and discography of Tallis.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6RgaPTo4hE for a performance of Tallis’ anthem, If Ye Love Me Keep My Commandments performed by the Cambridge singers, directed by John Rutter; see, also http://bibleasmusic.com/composers/thomas-tallis/ for a choral performance and a brass quintet performance of the same work.  At the bottom of that page you will also find a video of a choral performance of his In ieiunio et fletu (from Cantiones Sacrae, 1575)

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjAmQ-F6-jA&feature=related for a performance of his motet, “The Lamentations of Jeremiah.”

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Cn7ZW8ts3Y for a performance of the motet, Spem In Alium.  See, also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2rK_Yhpui8&feature=related for a video of a remarkable mass performance of this work with choirs totaling 700 singers in Manchester, England and conducted by David Lawrence.

God grant with grace (Psalm 67:1-2) – Thomas Tallis

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3_hbeXOTyY&feature=related for a collection of his sacred music, including Spem In Alium, and a note concerning the constantly shifting religious environment of England, in which he wrote. The comments of viewers of that particular blog are beautiful in their own right. Several affirm my own experience of the spiritual nature of aesthetic beauty.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/3437.html for recordings of his music available for purchase.

God grant with grace (Psalm 67:1-2) – Thomas Tallis

William Byrd

William Byrd (1540–1623) was an English composer contemporary with Thomas Tallis. He wrote sacred and secular polyphony and music for the keyboard, called a virginal. In 1575 he and Tallis were granted the exclusive right to print and publish music in England by Queen Elizabeth. The two composers jointly published 34 Latin motets, 17 each, dedicated to the Queen. He was a Catholic, remaining loyal to his Church when the Parliament established the Anglican church. When Pope Pius V issued a bull, absolving subjects of Queen Elizabeth from allegiance to her, Byrd became a subject of seditious suspicions.

He remained committed to his Catholic faith throughout his life, as was expressed in his approximately 50 motets. Many of his works have been associated with subjects of Jewish persecution and exile in Egypt and in Babylon, leading some experts to suggest that he intended those representations to analogize his lamentations to the plight of Catholics in England, particularly in his Tribue Domine of 1575, Tribulatio proxima est (1589) and Infelix ego (1591). Oen stylistic characteristic of his motets is its conservative preservation of the cantus firmus style, perhaps reflective of his Catholic allegiance.

For examples of his work, see the following:

Vigilate,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo9OnbLLnfE

Mass for Five Voices

Kyrie,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo3GYkAgylQ&feature=relmfu
Agnus Dei,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePqqoag8s1E
Credo,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjtxKpHSXzg&feature=related
Gloria,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adqkpCgkrIE&feature=related

Mass for 4 voices

Credo,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmCuwt3BNGQ&feature=related
Agnus Dei,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op8yU7Rl1TU&feature=relmfu
Sanctus

Ave Verum Corpus,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFZZMF7SRRo&feature=endscreen&NR=1

Note the preparations for dissonance, the dissonance, and its resolution.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

John Tavener (c. 1490 – 1545)

In the late 14th and early 15th centuries, Europe saw the church’s influence weakened politically, culturally, and theologically. With the organization of labor in guilds, and the increase of industry, local economies began to develop, leading to the rise of political states rivaling the power of the Church and the rise of a new aristocracy associated with the development of industry and trade. Previously, Latin had been the language of the church and of learning. With the rise of political states, their vernacular languages also developed. In the course of time, the vernacular became acceptable in courts of law and literature. With the invention and development of the printing press by Gutenberg in the early 15th century, the dissemination of ideas proliferated and empowered those who could afford the published books and pamphlets, wresting control of learning from the realm of the Church, which previously could provide the labor of monks to copy and decorate manuscripts in the official language of the church, Latin, and to disseminate it. With the advent of movable type, the power of the press and the printed word increased exponentially, expanding the scope of education beyond that provided by the Church. The power of ideas grew with the spread of learning from Church to university and to trade guilds.  The publication of ideas escaped the censorial grip of ecclesiastical authority, becoming available via commercial interests to a secular culture which became increasingly independent of the hurch.

Not all of these developments can be attributed to the printing press. Indeed, in the early 14th century, John Wycliff, writing in the official language of the church, Latin, laid the foundation for England to sever political and ecclesiastical ties to the Church and the establishment of the Church of England, based upon the model of its parent; not beholden to it, but “free” to serve the English monarchy. Wycliff, an ordained priest and a professor of theology at Oxford, introduced the doctrine of predestination, which, in some form or another, has dogged Protestant throughout its history. From that doctrine were derived notions of manifest destiny in the later colonization of distant lands by European powers, and even today by Christian notions in various degrees of “God’s will.”

With Wycliff arises a notion picked up by Luther and other reformers almost a century later that no priestly intermediary is necessary for a relationship of the Christian with God; rather, all persons are priests with the capacity of direct communion with God. God is not the exclusive property of the Church. Rather than the assertion of some Catholic mystics, such as St. Francis, that the world reveals the glory of God, Wycliff, in releasing laity from dependence upon the Church for direct communion with God, he taught a dualism and notion of Original Sin that harasses Protestantism yet  today;  he challenged the Catholic notion of transubstantiation which held that in the Catholic Eucharist the bread not merely represented the body of Christ but upon its consecration became the body of Christ, and the wine became his blood – not symbolically but literally. As a middle ground, he put forth the theological notion that Christ’s blood and body did not change the substance of the bread and wine, but became spiritually present in consubstantiation with Christ. He recommended that the Church in England declare independence from the Catholic Church.

At that same time, the riches of the earth and its minerals were discovered, mined and utilized in England and traded throughout Europe. The increase of the woolen industry, saw the rise of the business class, and, through trade with other European centers of commerce, brought great wealth to England. The manorial system throughout Europe had been weakened by the Church’s release of peasants from fealty to join the Crusades and by the influence of its encounters with Muslim and other civilizations in the process.

As political power became concentrated in local areas throughout Europe, and as they gained independence from the authority of the Church, conflicts between the states often resulted in war, some of it fitful and prolonged, as the Hundred Years War. That further weakened the manorial system. The populace shifted its allegiances from feudal lords and swore loyalty to its King. During that time the English language was established as the language of both English law and its courts. Increasingly, literature was written in the vernacular. Chaucer wrote his Canterbury Tales in the latter portion of the 14th century and through its characters provided the reader a baudy view of contemporary English political, ecclesiastical and social society of that time.

Biblical scholarship took a leap in England with Tyndale’s publication of the English New Testament. It was distinguished from prior versions in that he returned to the original Hebrew and Greek sources rather than the traditional Latin Vulgate. His intention was to make that Scripture directly accessible to the laity rather than as restricted to priestly mediation under the authority of papal orthodoxy.

John Tavener

John Tavener, an organist, and composer, was known as the most important English composer of his time. He wrote sacred vocal music, primarily, including masses, motets, antiphons, and Magnificats.

Like Johannes Ockeghem, he based a Mass upon a popular secular song, “The Western Wynde;”  and Johannes Ockeghem later wrote a mass on the same melody. Unusual for the day, John Tavener introduces that melody by three of the four voices of the Mass, at different times, nine times each.  In order to make each of the mass sections approximately of equal length, those with fewer words are more melismatically treated, as in the Gloria in the Christmas carol, “Angels We Have Heard on High.”  He also frequently uses the cantus firmus of a plainchant in an interior part, often augmenting it to draw it out, and to some extent disguise it from superficial hearing.  Some of his masses include sections for soloists rather than the entire choir. The solo sections marked with the words “In Nomine” were at times scored for instruments.  Other composers began writing for groups of instruments, such as a viol consort, upon his modeling, also designated by the words, In Nomine. He often used material from a motet that he had composed to construct a mass.  The resultant form was called a “parody” mass.

You will also note that during this period of the Renaissance, although chordal progressions are limited, there is a sense of “drive to the cadence,” which is a major step toward chordal progression.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfdGvDjoJPM&feature=related for a performance of the Gloria from his “Westron wind

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0shjKZhQwfg&feature=fvwrel for a performance of his Sanctus and Benedictus from Missa Gloria Tibi Trinitas, with video that visually follows his score.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USOTo-xBHuw for a video of his Dum transisset sabbatum in the cathedral setting by Cappella Nicolai as it originally would have been performed.
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8YuEP2lDFo&playnext=1&list=PL3ACB2D630E255586&feature=results_main for a performance of his ‘Dum transisset Sabbatum,’ Easter Sunday with video representation of the score.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRl3qSAXGio&feature=related for a recording of his complete Missa O Michael, with video identification of the mass sections.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-TuRZugo9g&feature=related and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKPZJk2Kn0M&feature=related for his instrumental, In Nomine.

This performance of “The Mother of God” is sublime:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lp6P-GNIQG8&feature=relmfu is sublime!

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Johannes Ockeghem (ca. 1410 – 1497)

The Franco – Flemish school flourished in the area of the Netherlands. It was known for its development of polyphonic techniques and music, particularly that of the motet in which all four voices were interesting in their own right as melodies, of generally equal weight.  Johannes Ockeghem was an early member of this school the most well-known in the last part of the 15th century. He stands as a bridge between Dufay and Josquin des Prez. He wrote chanson, which is a secular, polyphonic song in which the music supports the lyrics; but his primary output was in the form of the Mass, in about half of which he continued to use the principle of the cantus firmus.  Of those, two masses are built upon a cantus firmus based upon the melody of a chanson that he had written.  He was well known for both the quality of his technique and of his expressive affect. The design of his bass line was likely affected by his experience as a bass singer: they are particularly interesting.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWLsLAujZzI for the Kyrie from his Missa Prolationum.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NYETxriizg&feature=related for a performance by The Clerks’ Group of the entire Missa Prolationum.

 

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1rfnruWYWs&feature=related for an almost three hour collection of Ockeghem’s sacred music.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT_fk6L0ULg&feature=related for a fascinating canonical treatment of Deo Gratias.  See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LlWhXNu_us&feature=related for a great video effect of the same initial canonical treatment by the Hilliard Ensemble, except expanded to enhance the visual effect.  Fun!

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Guillaume Dufay (ca. 1397 – 1474)

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-25R_SaDao for a performance of his Ave Maris Stella.  Although, as we previously mentioned concerning the harmonies of Medieval and Renaissance choral music, the harmonies do not rise to organized chordal progressions as that later introduced by Monteverdi, he uses a technique common to such chordal progressions: he creates a dissonance just before the close of the piece which resolves into a consonant chord of repose upon the tonic (the first scale degree).

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TacNIbmDZ4s&feature=related for another setting of Avé Maris Stella for women’s voices and organ.  You will note that the music is much more refined than is prior medieval music, part of which is attributable to its triadic harmonies, which, toward  the close of phrases or a series of phrases. anticipate a closing cadence.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcKasCiX26Y&feature=fvwrel for a performance of the Credo from Dufay’s L’homme armé (The Armed Man”) Mass.  L’homme armé was a popular, secular song in the 15th century, with overtones of political satire, which many composers of that century used as a cantus firmus (principal melody upon which the choral piece is built) for sacred works, such, as here, a mass.   See, also, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWyGfK4k2bs&feature=related for a performance of the Agnus Dei and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drqXpKuxuxc&feature=relmfu for the Gloria from the same Mass.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPEXi5Qkook for a performance of his Magnificat for voice and instruments.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/7690.html for recordings of Dufay’s music available for purchase at Classical Archives.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

John Dunstable (or Dunstaple) (c. 1390 – 1453)

Dunstable was one of the most famous composers active in the early 15th century, and a contemporary of Leonel Power. Until Dunstable, the octave, fifth, and fourth were considered stable and consonant intervals. It isn’t like these other intervals were not as good, indeed, you will note in most of these composers we have looked at so far, it is not unusual to have a passing second which is quite dissident, especially the minor second, but works very nicely when in a passing melodic line and is gently entered and resolved.  Dunstable was noted for his style of music known as the “English countenance,” or la contenance angloise.  He not only liked the interval of the third, but discovered that if one third was placed above another third, making a triad, it sounded very pleasing and stable, as did a third juxtaposed with a sixth.   Today we would know this combination as a chord; however, it would not be until Monteverdi in the early Baroque Period that these cords would be arranged into a chordal progression that could have the effect of giving the listener an expectation of what was to come, of leading the listener to anticipate what will come, which also could set up a harmonic surprise.  We haven’t arrived there yet.

In order to see the function of a chordal progression in Monteverdi as compared to the mere triadic structures in John Dunstable, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=zsL4MGFh6QI&feature=endscreen

Compare John Dunstable’s Veni Sancte Spriritus at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMboKS7ZJjk in which you will note passing dissonances of a second, a seventh or a nineth, with the chordal qualities of Monteverdi’s Lamento della Ninfa  at http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=zsL4MGFh6QI&feature=endscreen; or see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLjeL86pyBg&feature=related for a performance of the same piece in a different venue and by a different group.

See http://bibleasmusic.com/composers/john-dunstaple/ for a performance of Quam pulchra es [How beautiful you are] from the Song of Solomon 7:6, 7, 5a, 4a, 11a, 12.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yD4iGohZ81k&feature=related for a performance of his O rosa bella by soprano, harp and recorder.

Compare http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NvPxAY_ll4&feature=related for a different performance and instrumentation of the same composition.

See

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I4An0pfYNc for a performance by male voices of Sancta Maria, non est tibi similis.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6giWShdxi4&list=ALDZPCPAXS78g7xtnvcSpAQBxlYFA4q785&index=2&feature=plcp for a performance of his Salve Scema Sanctitatis.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei9btWV8uKc&feature=related for a performance of his Motets – Veni sancte spiritus – Veni Creator.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z010dVtscYw&feature=related for an organ performance of Agincourt Hymn.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I4An0pfYNc for a performance by male voices of Sancta Maria, non est tibi similis.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/2454.html for recordings of his compositions available for purchase at Classical Archives.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Leonel Power (ca. 1370 – 1445)

Leonel Power was one of the first composers to set the various creedal portions of the Mass as individual compositions, which could stand alone, or could be taken with the other parts of the mass as a whole.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFAg5iTx0DM&feature=related  for his Ave Regina

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sh9OqQ3HtM for another performance of the same Ave Regina with different voicing and key.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orRhbqcJ90I for his Gloria

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YmfKZTzE5U for his Tempora Vagantibus- Beata Progenies with spoken narration, instruments and voice

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXVsN44JPg4Missa for his Alma Redemptoris Mater, Credo a capella voice

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWjW47UMD1g for his Beata progenies

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXVsN44JPg4 for his Missa: Alma Redemptoris Mater, Credo

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/7826.html for recordings of Leonel Power’s works available for purchase at Classical Archives.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Jacopo da Bologna (1340–c. 1386)

We have mentioned the Ars Nova.  The Italian composer, Jacopo da Bologna wrote in that style.  He mostly wrote madrigals, both secular (as in a love song) and sacred; canonic (where the same melody starts at different times in different voices, as in Row, Row, Row Your Boat) and non-canonic; laudat-ballata (sacred but-noncanonical songs, such as Christmas carols) and motets (sacred polyphonic choral pieces meaning, literally, movement of voices against each other). The motet was a rather formal form in the organum tradition of multiple voices over a “cantus firmus,” or plainsong; it marked the beginning of polyphonic music known as counterpoint, i.e., point against point, or melody against melody.  Rather than parts that merely harmonizing with the cantus firmus, as the modern Protestant hymn, each part tended to be an interesting melody in itself, hence, “polyphonic.”  Despite that, his works often include parallel fifths which would be prohibited at the height of the polyphonic era, such as the music of Bach.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlxbuBiRim8&feature=related, which, I assume, is an instrumental rendition of a choral work.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-FYwWFgesU and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-75q6AMf3E&feature=fvwrel for choral performances of his works which I believe are secular; but I have been unable to find any sacred examples.  However, I did want to include him because of the remarkable contribution he made to the development of counterpoint.

See, also http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/8861.html for what again appear to be recordings of secular works.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Music of the Ars Nova

Adam de la Halle (1250 –  1306), also known as Adam the Hunchback, was one of the last trouvères (a northern France version of the troubadour).  He wrote both monophonic music and three-part, polyphonic music.  You will note the increasing complexity of the polyphonic music, in which there is greater independence of each of the melodic parts. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4-ilOMFIbg.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/2666.html  for his recordings available for purchase at Classical Archives.

Philippe de Vitry (1291-1361) was a true Renaissance man before his time: Not only was he a well-known poet and musician, but he was also a bishop, diplomat, administrator and political adviser. He was active in the Ars Nova, or New Art, which improved upon rhythmic notation, allowing for greater rhythmic precision in choral music. Previously rhythm was determined more by “rhythmic modes” or rhythmic patterns that the performers recognized and applied to the existing neumatic notation.  He also contributed to the development of the motet, which was polyphonic, a cappella (unaccompanied), and sacred. The motet also developed a secular form, much to the displeasure of the Catholic church. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4td8IdYiwp4 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCW7babiSEI&feature=relmfu

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/19544.html  for his recordings available for purchase at Classical Archives.

Guillaume de Machaut (c. P300 – April 1377) about whom we have significant biographical information  is one of the last poet – composers.   He wrote the first complete Ordinary Mass entitled Mass of Notre Dame, and he contributed to the development of the motet and a number of secular musical forms.  His secular works typically involved courtly love; his music is rhythmically intricate and innovative; and his poetry influenced many contemporary poets, including Jeffrey Chauser.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHRAYbgdxew and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y1O-BcZQwY&list=LPj6z2rdSnLkQ&index=2&feature=plcp, with video view of a page of its score, from sections of his Mass of Notre Dame.  You will note the throaty quality of each of these.  The first is more refined and nuanced; the second reminds me of “sacred harp” or “shaped note” singing which can yet be heard in some churches and places in the south.  (see http://fasola.org/introduction/note_shapes.html for an excellent site concerning this style of singing, its history; and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BJuO4zPJGk for video.)  By way of comparison, see, also, the following examples of his secular motets:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ti59NdbG1c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z8rt3hHUEY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOoYtdFhfqw&feature=related

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/6541.html  for an extensive list of his recordings available for purchase at  Classical Archives.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Gautier de Coincy (1177–1236)

From this time comes the raucous and seductive text, Carmina Burana.  Interestingly, it was preserved by Benedictine monks until they were printed in 1847. During that time, galliard poets and singers roamed France and Western Germany as “wandering scholars.” The time saw the rebirth of drama in the form of mystery plays or miracle plays which were first performed within the churches, and when the form outgrew the confines of the cathedral, it was staged on a platform outside the church. As the subjects became more secularized, performances were moved from the church grounds altogether to the marketplace.

Beowulf and other epic poetry were produced during this time.  Troubadours wandered southern France singing their lyric poetry of love and sensuality. In time, the they would sing the virtues of Mary, Mother of Jesus. Their influence spread into southern Germany, giving rise to German poets and singers, known as minnesingers, who spread through that region with their own songs of love and chivalry.

See  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijqNBpOU5Vs&feature=related for a modern rendition of a variety of troubadour song, including a lively call and response between troubadour and audience, lavishly accompanied by drums and tambourine; unison ballad style accompanied by drum; an extensive French narration interspersed with fife or other instruments; and a wide variety of other troubadour music.

If religion is to be relevant, it must somehow connect with the lives of its adherents. And so, secular music of the late Middle Ages left its mark on religious music, not so unlike how love songs of the early Twentieth Century affected hymnology of that time in its personalization and adoration of Jesus, such as “Oh, How I Love Jesus.”

Gautier de Coincy (1177–1236) was a troubadour who was known for his poetry in veneration of the Mother Mary about whom developed the Cult of the Virgin Mary.  He set his poetry to popular troubadour melodies and song of the time.  Those he compiled into a work, Miracles of Notre Dame.  While reverent, his songs are full of secular humor. At this time, we see an increasing impact of secularity on the Church and on religious life among the populace.  Mary was a figure that the populace could relate to.  Perhaps like a doting mother smiles upon her child’s mischievous nature and deeds, Mary was perceived as smiling upon their own celebrated frailty and wantonness. For the populace, she was a great antidote to Pauline holy rigidity.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KA8IEni-5w for Gautier’s Roÿne celeste, for solo voice and bowed string instrument. Note its similarity in musical texture to vocal organum which preceded.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWkWVbou4k8 for his Alla Francesca,  Les Miracles de Nostre-Dame for voice, percussion and flute.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/album/093046731724.html  for and album  of his Miracles of Notre Dame available for purchase at Classical Archive.

See http://www.classical.net/search/search.pl?Terms=Coincy  for other resources regarding  Coincy.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Twisted Christianity: The Crusades

The Crusades (1095 – 1291) had a profound impact on Western culture, directly or indirectly, both positively and negatively. It was destructive of life and property then and to this day, a millennium later, it has had harsh effects upon the relationships of Christians and Western nations with the rest of the world, particularly with the Arab, Muslim and Jewish parts of the world.  I do not attempt to justify them; inhumanity, whatever its form, especially that justified by “faith,” is indefensible.

Here is some history that preceded the Crusades.  Prior to them, Muslims  controlled Palestine. The Christians living there enjoyed freedom of religion, and Christian pilgrims were welcome to Jerusalem, much as Muslims  go to Mecca some time during their lifetime.  The Muslims who ruled the area were supportive of Christians who lived in Palestine, so much so that when the caliph of Cairo destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the Muslim rulers contributed greatly to its restoration.  However, when in 1047 the Seljug Turks took Jerusalem from the Fatimid Muslims, they were not tolerant of Christians living in their territory nor of pilgrims visiting Jerusalem. Moreover, the Byzantine Empire, which was considered to be at the crossroads between Asia and Europe, had become weak and  Latin Christendom feared that the Turks would advance into Europe, putting them in great danger. The Italian cities saw the Turks as an impediment to their markets in the near East.  Pope Urban decided that Christians must remove the Turks from their holy city, Jerusalem.  He called upon Christians to rally in a crusade.  They were to be marked with and led by the sign of the cross. As an inducement to crusaders, he offered benefits: serfs were freed from bondage to the soil and to the barons, prisoners were freed, death sentences were commuted, and spiritual benefits were conferred.

The First Crusade was from 1095 – 99, the Second from 1146 – 8,   the Third from 1189 – 92, and the Fourth from 1202 –4. Between Crusades, many crusaders settled in Muslim lands near Jerusalem, marrying their women and adapting to their ways. Much evil was done in the name of Christianity during each of the Crusades; and often, but not always, they were met with like force and retribution from Muslims.  After the demise of the Fourth Crusade, church leaders in Western Europe concluded that perhaps the reason for their lack of success in four consecutive Crusades was that the crusaders were not innocent: perhaps only innocents, children, could regain Jerusalem.  So, about 30,000 children at the average age of 12 were gathered and sent across the Alps to Italy, where they expected to have ships to take them to Jerusalem.   When the survivors arrived at Genoa they were met with derision.  There were no ships to Palestine. Many children died on their Alpine trek to Italy and yet more on their return through those same Alps. Two more Crusades were attempted thereafter, this time with adult crusaders.  In the final Crusade, the crusaders robbed a Muslim caravan, hung 19 merchants and raided several Muslim towns. When Sultan Khalil demanded reparation of the crusaders, and was refused it, he lay siege to Acre, a Christian town in Palestine, took it, and left his men free to kill or enslave its 60,000 inhabitants.

It should come as no surprise that, contemporaneously with the Crusades, the Church began its Inquisition, in which it tortured and killed its own for departing from official doctrine, or even upon the suspicion or allegation of heresy. It was rules-based terror, utterly contradictory to what is known of Jesus’ life and teaching.  Tolstoy later asserted that Christianity is not a set beliefs, but a way of life.  True faith does not need defended, but must be lived in loving community with all humanity, unconditionally.

Through the Crusades, Christian Europe discovered a Muslim civilization, more enlightened and much superior to its own.  Many serfs who had obtained release from the land, never returned.  By then, the Roman Empire was weakened, as was the Roman Catholic Church; but the French monarchy was strengthened. With the contact of Christians with the Muslim world came new markets for Italian and Flemish industry, the establishment of towns and the rise of the middle class. With Christian zeal waning, secular life was stimulated. As industry and commerce developed so did European culture and learning.   The arts were beginning to experience a Renaissance as Greek and Roman classics were discovered, many of which were preserved and discovered in monasteries. Gothic architecture utilized and improved upon classical forms, such as the arch, and the cathedrals which were built were as much a tribute to human ingenuity and perseverance as they were praise to God.

See, also, my prior post during my discussion of architecture, https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/medieval-music-and-scholasticism/.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Abelard and Heloise

The intellectual, richly romantic but tragic lives of Abelard and Heloise are expressive of the tension among independence of thought,  Church authority, and its unnatural demands of celibacy in an increasingly secular world. One of Abelard’s first teachers was Jean Roscelin who was condemned by the Church for challenging its “nominalism.” Although scholasticism sought rational support for the Church’s creed and doctrine, it started, not from observation, but from a notion that it accepted as authoritative.    That irrational and unobserving leap, which the church called Faith, was exposed as such by Roscelin.  He challenged the notion that the Church was an independent spiritual entity existing above its individual members; or that the notion of the Trinity had a separate existence: “three persons” must either be an abstraction, not a reality, or they are three separate gods.  He was twice condemned for his challenge to the Church doctrine of the Trinity. The Church was defended by Anselm who took up Augustine’s assertion, “I do not seek to understand in order to believe; I believe in order to understand.”

More broadly, Abelard challenged the scholastic notion that concepts such as “Church,” “man,” and “divine providence” had an existence as such.  [In that respect he anticipated the “radical” book of 1999,  Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, by George Lakoff, and Mark Johnson.] Abelard, as do Lakeoff and Johnson, asserted that such concepts were merely descriptive of life in the flesh and in the physical world.  He became a leader of the young rebels of the “modern” school. He opened his own school in Paris, where he studied and taught literature and philosophy.  There, he became cannon of the Notre Dame Cathedral.

Heloise was an orphan and was raised by her uncle, the canon Fulbert.  He sent her to a convent where she became known as the best student they ever had. When she was 16, her uncle took Abelard into the home to tutor her.  Of that, Abelard later wrote, “the man’s simplicity was nothing short of astounding; I should not have been more surprised if he had entrusted a tender lamb to the care of a ravenous wolf.” Not long after his arrival at the home, Heloise found herself pregnant.  Abelard was foolish enough to boast of his conquest.  After some convoluted intrigue, Abelard tells us that her uncle and kin stole into his room when he was sleeping and “they cut off those parts of my body whereby I had done that which was the cause of their sorrow.”  He urged Heloise to become a nun and he became a monk. Heloise joined a cloister and, in time, became a prioress, much loved by her charges and the religious community. Abelard helped her establish new quarters for the convent. At that time he wrote his autobiography, Historia Calamitatum Mearum, which contained both his confession and a defense of his theology.

Abelard and Heloise in a manuscript of the Roman de la Rose

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A9lo%C3%AFse_d%E2%80%99Argenteuil  for the source of the above photograph of the manuscript.

Will Durant, the source of the above quotes, writes the following of Abelard in The History of Civilization, The Age of Faith at pages 938-940:

Truth cannot be contrary to truth, Abelard pleads; the truths of Scripture must agree with the findings of reason, else the God who gave us both would be deluding us with the one or the other . . .

Abelard did not question the authority of the Bible but he argued that its language was meant for unlettered people, and must be interpreted by reason; that the sacred text had sometimes been corrupted by interpolation or careless copying; and that for scriptural or patristic passages which contradict one another, reason must attempt their reconciliation.. . . .

Anticipating the “Cartesian doubt” by 400 years, he wrote in the same prologue: “The first key to wisdom is assiduous  and frequent questioning….For by doubting we come to inquiry, and by inquiry we arrive at the truth.”

[Concerning the divine unity and Trinity, Durrant writes of  Abelard’s ideas:]  It was futile to utter words which the intellect could not possibly follow, that nothing could be believed unless it could first be understood, and that it was absurd for anyone to preach to others a thing which neither he himself, nor those whom he sought to teach, could comprehend….

He pointed out the unity of God was the one point agreed upon by the greatest religions and the greatest philosophers. In the one God we may view his power as the first person, his wisdom as the second, his grace, charity, and love as the third; these are phases or modalities of the divine essence; but all the works of God suppose and unite at once His power, His wisdom, and His love.  When my father, Rev. Edgar F. Wheeler, attended a Baptist seminary in New Orleans during the late 1940’s, he was taught a similar view of the Trinity as modalities of perception.

Sculpture of Abelard by Jules Cavelier at the Louvre Palace, Paris

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A9lo%C3%AFse_d%E2%80%99Argenteuil  for the source of the above photograph of the sculpture.

Although some in the Church hierarchy and many philosophers believed his teaching on the Trinity to be appropriate, Church authorities called him to Soissons to defend his book, The Trinity. When he appeared as ordered, he was not permitted to speak in his own defense because of fear that his power of persuasion would be irresistible. Therefore, without hearing, he was condemned to burn his book and to be confined in a monastery cell. A year later, a new Abbott permitted him to be released to establish a hermitage, where he lived and resumed teaching and writing. His teaching was preserved in two books, Theologia Christiana and Theologia. 

Will Durrant writes at page 941,

He could not believe that all these wonderful pre-Christian minds had missed salvation; God, he insisted, gives his love to all peoples, Jews and heathen included.… Those who recommend faith without understanding are in many cases seeking to cover up their inability to teach the faith intelligibly… Abelard sought to embrace the most mystic doctrines of the church within the grasp of reason.

Abelard sent a copy of his Historia Calamitatum Mearum to Heloise, to whom history imputes a lengthy reply, including in part:

To her master, nay father, to her husband, nay brother: his handmaid, nay daughter, his spouse, nay sister: to Abelard, Heloise.…

Thou knowest, dearest – all men know – what I have lost in thee.… Obeying thy command, I changed both my habit and my hair, that I might show thee to be the possessor of both my body and mind.…

Tell me one thing only if thou canst: why, after our conversion [to the religious life], which thou alone didst decree, I am falling into such neglect and oblivion with thee that I am neither refreshed by thy speech and presence, nor comforted by a letter in thine absence. . . . Concupiscence joined thee to me rather than affection.…

I deserved more from thee, having done all things for thee….

… Farewell, my all.

See http://www.monadnock.net/poems/eloisa.html for Alexander Popes poem, Eloisa to Abelard.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Perotin (ca.1200)

The same anonymous English student at the Notre Dame school who identified Léonin as the greatest composer of organum, also identifies Perotin as  Magister Petronius, or in English, “Pérotin the Master” of organum.  He was known for the development of three – part and four – part organa.  He was the most famous of all of the composers of the Notre Dame school.

A prominent feature of his compositional style was to take a simple, well-known melody and stretch it out in time, so that each syllable was hundreds of seconds long, and then use each note of the melody (the tenor, Latin for “holder”, or cantus firmus) as the basis for rhythmically complex, interweaving lines above it. The result was that one or more vocal parts sang free, quickly moving lines (“discants“) over the chant below, which was extended to become a slowly shifting drone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C3%A9rotin

A page from Pérotin’s Alleluia nativitas

In addition to organum, which was liturgical music, Pérotin also wrote conductus, which was sacred but not liturgical, more akin to the modern hymn.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvJ6xl3l1ek&feature=related for “ Views of Notre Dame de Paris accompanied by Perotin’s 4-part organum ‘Sederunt principes.’”

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJxRDhejtwo  for Perotin’s 3-part organum Alleluia nativitas.

For a early work for organ in the organum style, Perotin’s “Alleluya. Nativitas” at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QyfuEuxQmo&feature=watch_response.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7OWtlfxAqU for Perotin’s Viderunt omnes in four parts, which I find interesting for several reasons. First, it begins with a forte “Vi-“ which decrescendos dramatically during which the base part drops out. You will also note that he uses a middle voice drone.  There is some of the same dissonance which slightly wrenches the listener at significant moments of the music and then resolves, often to close a musical section.  Throughout, the video fixes on a portion of an illuminated manuscript, presumably of the music that is sung.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/7631.html  for recordings available for purchase at Classical Archives.

See, also, http://www.classical.net/search/search.pl?Terms=Perotin  for other resources regarding  Perotin.

Léonin (1150 – 1201)

Whereas Hildegard composed her own original melodies with traditional texts or those of her own, and embellished Gregorian chant and notated a single melody, Léonin is the first notable composer of organum, which consisted of the melody (usually plainchant) with a second voice (or part) that paralleled the melody at a particular, usually larger interval, such as a fourth (as F and C) or a fifth (as G and C) plus a bass part which was likely not interesting alone, but, if you will, anchored the higher parts, as would a drone.  Little is known of Léonin except through the writing of one of of the later students at the Notre Dame school of polyphony and the ars antiqua style known as Anonymous IV. That student referred to referred to Léonin’s Magnus Liber, or, Great Book, and called Léonin the finest composer of organum.  Although the famous troubadours were active during this time and had their own secular music, accompanied with instruments, organum is strictly sacred liturgical music.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9onin for an excellent article concerning Léonin.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq5B3M4jRtQ&feature=related for a video of Leonin’s Allelujah for two voices in which the second part is limited to a gradually changing series of drones or, or perhaps more accurately, pedal points, or baseline called a bourdon.  To my ear, the bourdon provides a simple foundation, over which the melody meanders without any notion of chordal progression.  That would not appear until Monteverdi developed it at the end of the Renaissance and the beginning of the Baroque Periods.

See  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COKDFEXaimg&list=LPo3AypYmE-oI&index=1&feature=plcp, Dulce Lignum, meaning “sweet the wood.”  It is part of the Christian observance of Good Friday and refers to the pain and suffering of Jesus when he was crucified.  For an excellent article on the meaning of that suffering in the Catholic tradition, see http://inumbrissanctipetri.blogspot.com/2008/03/dulce-lignum-dulce-pondus-sustinans.html.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tdgNAoFb-I  for Alleluia Dies Sanctificatus Illuxit Nobis – Magister Leóninus,  performed by male voices as pictures of Notre Dame Cathedral merge from one to another taking us on a visual tour from outside the Cathedral and throughout it as the experience of the music and the environment may have been when Léonin  lived.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyuWGI1sYM&feature=BFa&list=LPo3AypYmE-oI, which is another Allelujah, more lively, with the addition of bells or chimes. it also demonstrates a number of different functions for the additional voice: not only does it begin with the second part supporting the melody with a series of drones, but it also demonstrates the organum at an octave.

The above site also features a number of excellent performances of a variety of Léonin’s  compositions.  Among them, is a fascinating, nuanced set of accordion variations on  a Léonin melody (who would have thought it!!) by V. Nedosekin (bayan)  entitled, “Improvisation on a theme by Léonin” at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibCoyzu5UEc&feature=BFa&list=LPo3AypYmE-oI.  This is BRILLIANTLY IMPROVISED AND PERFORMED, first as voices might have sung it at the time that Leonin composed it, and in the manner, so far as can be determined, that he intended it to be performed. Upon the statement of the theme, it is expressed and interpreted through a range of stylistic periods, moods and treatments, including several dissonant effects, some of them startling, even stabbing, but all of them with captivating affect.  For some reason, it reminds me of Charles Ives’ Variations on America, althhave taken the latter to be simple fun indicative of a composer and organist young at heart.  These variations by  Nedosekin cannot be taken lightly, although that may have an appropriate place among them.

Part of what fascinates me about Léonin’s music is his use of dissonance, as when two parts are in unison and one of them moves upward or downward a step or half a step as thas the other part sustains the same, creating a momentary and a gently twisting dissonance  and resolution that is a characteristic that I note in Russian sacred choral music, as well.  Another characteristic of organum form is that it’s beginning and ending is often an Allelujah, in ABA form.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/work/289882.html  for recordings of Léonin’s works available for purchase at  Classical Archives.

See, also, http://www.classical.net/search/search.pl?Terms=L%E9onin  for another resources regarding  Léonin.

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

Chant, the Mass and Hildegard of Bingen (1098 – 1179)

Constantine is the first Roman Emperor to convert to Christianity. His predecessor, Diocletian, had waged a fierce persecution against the Christians, the severest in Christian history. Civil War had erupted.  Constantine was commanding his army against rebel forces that were twice the size of his.  The night before battle, Constantine had a dream, the contemporary reports of which conflict in details but are consistent in general affect: if the sign of the cross of the crucified Christ led his soldiers into battle, he would be victorious. He did so, was victorious, and continued in military successes with the same talisman.  The final battle was seen as a religious war: Christianity against paganism.  Constantine prevailed.  He saved the Empire, attributing his success to the Christian God.  He then proceeded to organize Christianity throughout the Empire, and made it the new state religion.  He called church leaders to Nicaea, where he led the Council in establishing a common creed which would resolve various conflicting statements of faith, particularly concerning the divinity or humanity of Christ and that relationship to God and the Holy Spirit.   That council addressed those issues and Constantine established uniformity throughout the empire concerning the Trinity. It remains as the predominant creed of Christians, although later councils would adjust it for their own particular interpretations of the Bible.  In its current English form, it states:

We believe in one God, the Father, the Almighty maker of heaven and earth, of all that is, seen and unseen.

We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
of one Being with the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit
he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary, and was made man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered death and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in accordance with the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of Life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son.
With the Father and the Son he is worshipped and glorified.
He has spoken through the Prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come. Amen 

See, also, The Nicene Creed at http://www.onbeing.org/program/need-creeds/feature/nicene-creed/1294 and The Need for Creeds at http://www.onbeing.org/program/need-creeds/211

By the time of Pope Gregory, (540 – 604), the official chants of the church were established as Gregorian chant.

Although there were some variations among churches of different regions throughout the Holy Roman Empire,  It was established generally as the Ordinarily Mass  which was observed each Sunday, the which long before had been established as the holy day of worship in commemoration of the disciples’ experience of Jesus’ resurrection.

The mass became a central part of Christian worship and was celebrated with Gregorian chant, in which the priest, monks, perhaps a choir, or even the congregation, might participate.  The Ordinary Mass has five parts:

Kyrie Eleison (” Lord Have Mercy”)

Gloria (” Glory to God in the Highest”)

Credo (” I Believe in One God”), the Nicene Creed

Sanctus (“Holy, Holy, Holy”)

Agnus Dei (“Lamb of God”)

Because the Mass was a central part of worship, and it’s melodies were officially recognized by the Church throughout the Empire, there was opportunity to embellish those melodies, not unlike the renditions of the national anthem that we often hear at our sport events today.  In time, not only might the melodies be embellished, but additional parts may have been added, such as a drone below, a counter melody, a descant, or even interplay of the various melodic parts, each interesting in its own right, together making a lively musical discourse.  As the embellishments became more ornate, or as more melodic lines were added, notation became necessary for teaching and performance purposes.  Guido of Arezzo (991-1050) met that need by devising a system of notation to aid participants in their performances.  Hildegard was one of its beneficiaries.

Hildegard of Bingen was one of the earliest composers of embellished melodies of Gregorian chant, to which she added her own original and notated melodies.  She was born in 1098 in the portion of the Holy Roman Empire that is now known as Germany.  She was a nun, or “abbess,” of the Benedictine order, and, although she was one of the first names to be submitted to church authorities for canonization, it was resisted until 2012 when she wasn’t canonized, but the church finally relented to give her what has been described as the “equivalent” of canonization, or “sainthood:” “Doctor of the Church.”  She was known as the “Sibyl (prophetess) of the Rhine” for her visions; she was a German writer, philosopher, mystic, and composer, predating what would later become known as a “Renaissance man,” or, rather, she was a Renaissance woman.

Early in her life Hildegard had remarkable visions.  By the time she was three years of age, she had her first vision that was described as “The Shade of the Living Light.”   By age eight, her parents cloistered her in a nunnery.  That, of course, would also provide her  an education at an early age, quite unusual for a child of her age or, for that matter, for any female of that day.

She continued to have visions throughout her life, until she had a vision, not unlike that of Mohammed, in which God told her to “write down that which you see and hear.”  This was quite disconcerting for her.  Doubtful of the authenticity of the command, she resisted. She described those struggles in Scivias (“Know the Ways”).  She suffered many illnesses before she took seriously that “message from God,” not unlike Jonah, and did what she was told to do in her vision.  She wrote several books on religious subjects and theology, becoming well known. Ultimately, Pope Eugenus gave his approval that she document her visions. Even more unusual, he authorized her to preach.  She wrote two volumes on natural medicine; a gospel commentary; three volumes of her visionary experiences, which were artistically decorated as she directed; and a morality play, which was popular during the latter part of the Middle Ages, entitled, Play of the Virtues.  The morality plays of that time included music, which were precursors to later polyphonic music and included instruments in its performance. She developed her own alphabet, indeed her own language called, “Lingua ignota,”and was a prolific correspondent by letter.   She wrote monophonic music, elaborately and delicately ornate, some based upon existing chant, and some her own.  About 70 pieces of her music are known to us, much of it with her poetic text.

See http://www.sol.com.au/kor/5_02.htm  for a scholarly but interesting article entitled HILDEGARD of Bingen: Cosmic Christ, Religion of Experience, God the Mother, which was apparently posted by Institute in Culture and Creation Spirituality, Holy Names College, Oakland, CA, from which I quote: “Hildegard awakens us to symbolic consciousness. An awakening to symbolism is an
awakening to deeper connection-making, to deeper ecumenism, to deeper healing,
to deeper art, to deeper mysticism, to deeper social justice..

See http://www.stumptuous.com/hildegard.html  for another scholarly and interesting article entitled EGO PAUPERCULA FEMINEA FORMA Hildegard of Bingen and the Re/Visionary Feminine for articlefrom a feminist view.   See http://home.infionline.net/~ddisse/hildegar.html#anchor197894  for a similar view but with excerpts from various entitled, A BLAZING MIND LONGING TO SOAR ABOVE THE CLOUDS.”   It includes several excerpts of Hildegard’s writing as translated to English.

Illumination from the Liber Scivias showing Hildegard receiving a vision and dictating to her scribe and secretary

Hildegard von Bingen

See http://www.last.fm/music/Sequentia+-+Hildegard+von+Bingen/+images/75630222  for the source of the above photograph of the original medieval painting.   I note that the figure of Hildegard seems to float above the floor, perhaps indicating that the painter considered her to be representative of the divine, even then a saint, which would be consistent with her well – known writings describing her visions.   Also in the foreground you will note a contemporary organ, precursor to the modern organ, and in the background, mounted on the wall, is some contemporary music manuscript.   The notes that are shown on it are not in modern form, and are called neumes, which indicated the pitches , but only approximated  the rhythms  of the chant.

See, also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hildegard_of_Bingen

Medieval Illuminated Music Manuscript

For examples of modern performances of Hildegard’s music, see

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJEfyZSvg5c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGPZWUNwLG0&feature=fvwrel

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yXJ0MDTI4Q for a beautiful Kyrie  from Marriage of the Heavens and the Earth.      I don’t know how much of this performance is true to any original manuscript I Hildegard and how much is interpretation or adaptation.  But, it is beautiful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXRJY9P3Lhc&feature=related

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4BGvlwyExI&feature=fvsr for a gorgeous contemporary homage , “Hildegard von Bingen, The Marriage of the Heavens and the Earth”  I note one comment to that post questions some of the performance as not being necessarily historical  or introducing elements not common to late medieval musical culture.   I take this homage To be a contemporary expression of gratitude for the music of Hildegard , expressed in contemporary language.

See, also, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEI1QrZINeg  a German language tribute to Hildegard, with English subscripts, which is  an official US trailer to the film,  FROM THE LIFE OF HILDEGARD VON BINGEN.    This clip was uploaded by Zeitgeist Films on August 4, 2010.

See Hildegard von bingen- O vis aeternitatis- Cantides of Ectasy sequantia- Chants de l’extase, at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eFPJa95qQEIt is sung by women over a true instrumental drone ( single note ). It also features some beautiful graphics of visual art and photography.   The word in the title, sequentia, refers to chant that was not part of the Gregorian chant repertoire, but rather based upon poetic texts that are not partthat are not part of, arising in the ninth century.   that is a form that Hildegard inherited that might seem to have been made in anticipation of her life, poetry, and music.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXRJY9P3Lhc&feature=related.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWQWO_TaX-0 for a contemporary interpretation and  tribute to Hildegard for two voices, guitar accompanimen that sounds like a synthesize sound of orchestra.   It is possible that some of  Hildegard’s  melodies are incorporated  in the arrangemt but the melodies are so romanticized that I cannot recognize medieval qualities in it . This is more like  mood music  in response to  the woman, Hildegar.  Having said that, there are a number of  moving graphics  which   range from  script  to  pictures of  artistic  responses  from that time to the present  which I take  to be authentic.    I, personally,  don’t care  too much  for the style  as being what I consider trite; however,  it works and  is a beautiful tribute when  joined  with so much visual  artistic  and  informational substance. Iin addition,  the site contains  some information concerning  her and the church that she served , from which I quote  excerpts as follows:  “She refused to allow the church to treat women as subservient to men, she rejected negative stereotypes of evil seductresses, and taught that woman was indeed created in the image and likeness of god.”

At the age of 80, she defied the church by burying a revolutionary at her abbey. Fellow clerics ordered her to exhume the body. She protested that the man had had his sins absolved. The clerics authorized local authorities to exhume the body, but she formally blessed all of the graves and then removed the tombstones so that they could not tell which grave was his. The clerics placed a ban on mass and music within her abbey, but the ban was later lifted.

It is no wonder that it has taken almost 1000 years  for the  Catholic Church,  even yet a man’s  organization,  to give her special  recognition ,  but not exactly sainthood, and that women would take so much inspiration from her life and gifts to us in music,  her poetry,  her theology  and in her own story.  What a remarkable woman!

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4r9A-brsrg&feature=fvwrel  for a collection of performances of the 11th Century French polyphony.

See http://www.classicalarchives.com/composer/8262.html  for an extensive list of Hildegard recordings available  for purchase at Classical Archives.

 

Links to my site:

Introduction https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/introduction/

Graphic Arts https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/i-graphic-arts/

Architecture https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ii-church-architecture-and-its-incorporation-of-art/

Music https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iii-music/

Theology https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/iv-theology/

Home Page https://bibleartists.wordpress.com/

See http://www.classical.net/search/search.pl?Terms=Hildegard for other musical resources regarding Hildegard.